One neighbor has a concern that our Urban Woodchucks might be dangerous. He says that once, when dismantling a woodpile, he was charged by one. Our local animal trapper says they are peaceful and shy. Actions speak louder than words - I guess I've only see them as peaceful and shy. And despite fears that their underground network might damage our property, it appears that its unlikely.
I wish I felt as comfortable with Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. She announced today that she is resigning as Governor, and gave some rather cryptic reasons why. It would seem probable that she not end up as a presidential candidate; especially after 'quitting' the governorship. I'm quite sure that she has obtained a multimillion dollar offer from - oh , say, FOX TV; to have her own talk show or "news" show. There, she can be a vocal cheerleader for the uber right.
What's more dangerous? Sarah Palin or Urban Woodchucks? What's the old saying: "you can put lipstick on a woodchuck, but it's still a woodchuck.."
As FOX says: "We report, YOU decide!"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Seems that humans have done more damage to property than a lowly woodchuck. Is it really "your" property? :)
ReplyDeleteno - actually, it's the woodchucks...
ReplyDelete